Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:13 pm
Gazza, just to update you on the UV thing.
I left mine on when you turned yours back off due to the appearance or increase of BW, which I assume was due to the elimination of single cell algae. Despite not previously being able to see any algae I'm convinced there was a low level which the UV killed off, no competition = more BW!
I added the GAC as you know, but I also took the TDS down to 80 and kept it there. Normally I let TDS run between 80 and 110, with 80 being only around 25% of the time. On this occasion I kept it between 80 and 90 for the last couple of weeks, ORP back to 395 avg and BW GONE.
I had the damn stuff in every filter last week, it was simply falling apart, I had to clear baskets etc daily and used double the cartridges in the skimmer filter. It's slowing down now as there's scarcely any BW remaining, one really has to search to find a strand in the pond.
This is with sunlight increasing daily, so looks promising longer term. I think that with low TDS and very high ORP I have the BW beaten.
More importantly though this is I hope the final step in my quest to abolish ill health of any kind in my Koi, from parasites to bacterial infections and the ulcerous results. With the added benefit of rapid healing from self inflicted woulds etc. and optimum growth rates.
I want to keep the UV on as I think the 55w is enough to reduce bacteria count. I know that some will say this also reduces beneficial bacteria but think about it. With high ORP / REDOX the unwanted bacteria are getting nuked constantly through the reduction processes. The water is so clean that unwanted bacteria are kept to a minimum, the UV will hopefully add to that reduction. So, who needs friendly bacteria other than the nitrifiers? With much trial and error over time I have created 5 star hospitality suites (filters) for these so they won't be leaving those! The few which do transfer to the water column and into the UV will not be missed.
Whilst it may be a cliche it really is all about balance, albeit to a refined degree if you want a self help pond for your koi. I would stress though that with the correct advice prior to setting up a pond such a system need not cost a Kings (or even a Prince's) ransome.
Time will be the final test of my theories, but the improvements over the last year since it all started to come together have been nothing short of spectacular. I wish I could have implemented all the elements of my system design at a stroke! Unfortunately however, had I done so I would not have been able to "prove" each element individually, nor analyse it's synergies or specific contribution to the overall system. Patience on this occasion has for me paid large dividends, and my sister (and a few friends) have inherited a fair amount of paraphenalia along the way, as I discarded the items which did not possess the sought after synergies.
I am totally convinced there is a "system" which is optimum for the purpose, I am equally convinced I have evolved same. I shall away now to ready myself for Sunday dinner and a bottle of fine wine. (well, Hock actually!)
Chi
I left mine on when you turned yours back off due to the appearance or increase of BW, which I assume was due to the elimination of single cell algae. Despite not previously being able to see any algae I'm convinced there was a low level which the UV killed off, no competition = more BW!
I added the GAC as you know, but I also took the TDS down to 80 and kept it there. Normally I let TDS run between 80 and 110, with 80 being only around 25% of the time. On this occasion I kept it between 80 and 90 for the last couple of weeks, ORP back to 395 avg and BW GONE.
I had the damn stuff in every filter last week, it was simply falling apart, I had to clear baskets etc daily and used double the cartridges in the skimmer filter. It's slowing down now as there's scarcely any BW remaining, one really has to search to find a strand in the pond.
This is with sunlight increasing daily, so looks promising longer term. I think that with low TDS and very high ORP I have the BW beaten.
More importantly though this is I hope the final step in my quest to abolish ill health of any kind in my Koi, from parasites to bacterial infections and the ulcerous results. With the added benefit of rapid healing from self inflicted woulds etc. and optimum growth rates.
I want to keep the UV on as I think the 55w is enough to reduce bacteria count. I know that some will say this also reduces beneficial bacteria but think about it. With high ORP / REDOX the unwanted bacteria are getting nuked constantly through the reduction processes. The water is so clean that unwanted bacteria are kept to a minimum, the UV will hopefully add to that reduction. So, who needs friendly bacteria other than the nitrifiers? With much trial and error over time I have created 5 star hospitality suites (filters) for these so they won't be leaving those! The few which do transfer to the water column and into the UV will not be missed.
Whilst it may be a cliche it really is all about balance, albeit to a refined degree if you want a self help pond for your koi. I would stress though that with the correct advice prior to setting up a pond such a system need not cost a Kings (or even a Prince's) ransome.
Time will be the final test of my theories, but the improvements over the last year since it all started to come together have been nothing short of spectacular. I wish I could have implemented all the elements of my system design at a stroke! Unfortunately however, had I done so I would not have been able to "prove" each element individually, nor analyse it's synergies or specific contribution to the overall system. Patience on this occasion has for me paid large dividends, and my sister (and a few friends) have inherited a fair amount of paraphenalia along the way, as I discarded the items which did not possess the sought after synergies.
I am totally convinced there is a "system" which is optimum for the purpose, I am equally convinced I have evolved same. I shall away now to ready myself for Sunday dinner and a bottle of fine wine. (well, Hock actually!)
Chi